I wish to address and clarify several points arising from my recent interview with Channel 4 News on 26 November 2025 regarding the Wang Fuk Court fire in Tai Po, which has drawn significant attention from both international media and the public.
In the interview, I stated that bamboo is a combustible material and can contribute to fire spread, referencing the Society of Fire Protection Engineers (SFPE) Foundation Report 2025, which confirms that “bamboo, like wood, is combustible, and undergoes a similar combustion process.” I also mentioned that other materials present, such as plastic nets and foam plates, may have played a role in the rapid development of the fire. However, I acknowledge that my comments may have given the impression that bamboo scaffolding was the major factor in the fire’s spread. This was not my intention. The actual contribution of bamboo, relative to other materials, is a complex scientific question that requires systematic investigation and fire experiments. At present, there is no comprehensive research on this issue in Hong Kong or elsewhere. My intention was to highlight the need for further study and caution in the use of combustible materials, especially in buildings occupied by vulnerable residents.
I also wish to clarify that my statement suggesting the fire spread “in one or two minutes” to approximately 30 floors was not based on detailed investigation, but rather an observation of the rapid vertical fire spread. I regret any misunderstanding and will refrain from making further public comments until thorough scientific research has been conducted.
During the interview, I mistakenly stated that fire engines from Chinese Mainland had arrived in Hong Kong to assist with firefighting efforts. This was incorrect. My comment was based on social media footage, but I have since learned from official sources that no such deployment occurred. I sincerely apologise for this error and any confusion it may have caused.
Regarding the question of aerial ladder trucks, I stated that no city has ladder trucks capable of reaching 100 or 200 meters. While such equipment does exist in some places, including Shenzhen, their use is limited by practical constraints such as the width of access roads. I acknowledge that my statement may have oversimplified the issue and appreciate the opportunity to clarify.
This interview has underscored the need for rigor and prudence in public commentary on matters of community significance. As an academic, I recognise that my statements carry responsibilities to factual accuracy and professional integrity. Moving forward, I will uphold our academic mission’s core principles: verifying information thoroughly, basing remarks on evidence and expertise, and exercising greater caution. This experience reinforces my commitment to responsible engagement on public safety and community issues.
Thank you.
Xinyan Huang
Associate Professor, Department of Building Environment and Energy Engineering
30 November 2025
