Skip to main content Start main content
JOBS

Carbon Taxes and Labour-Market Adjustment: Who Bears the Transition Costs?

As governments expand climate policies to reduce emissions, concerns persist about their consequences for jobs and wages. In a study published in European Economic Review, Prof. Chi Man Yip of the School of Accounting and Finance (AF) at The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (PolyU), together with Dr. Feng Wei at The Shandong University, examines how British Columbia’s carbon tax affected labour-market outcomes. Their research, “The ins and outs of employment: Labor market adjustments to carbon taxes”, moves beyond average employment effects to identify how wage and unemployment adjustments occur.

The study’s central innovation is to distinguish between the effects on incumbent workers and new hires, and to decompose unemployment into job-separation and job-finding channels. This distinction is important because a policy may affect labour-market outcomes through gradual turnover rather than immediate changes in the pay of workers already in employment.

Research Design and Context

Wei and Yip (2025) use the introduction of British Columbia’s carbon tax on 1 July 2008 as a quasi-natural experiment. The tax applied broadly to fossil-fuel consumption and its rate increased annually from CA$10 per tonne of carbon-dioxide equivalent in 2008 to CA$30 in 2012. Because the policy was introduced in British Columbia but not in other Canadian provinces during the study period, the authors apply a difference-in-differences design comparing British Columbia with the rest of Canada before and after the policy.

The analysis uses public-use files from the monthly Canadian Labour Force Survey, which covers approximately 100,000 individuals per month. The primary sample covers July 2005 to June 2015. The data enable the authors to examine hourly wages, unemployment, job tenure, unemployment-spell duration and industry, while accounting for demographic characteristics and common time effects.

Key Findings

The authors estimate that the carbon tax reduced the average hourly wage in British Columbia by 2.5% and increased the unemployment rate by 1.3 percentage points relative to other Canadian provinces. The estimated wage and unemployment effects followed different paths over time. Unemployment increased immediately after the policy but later diminished, whereas the average wage effect emerged with a delay and grew gradually.

The evidence is consistent with wage adjustment operating primarily through labour turnover. New hires experienced an estimated 4.1–4.6% decline in hourly wages after the policy, while the analysis finds no systematic reduction in the wages of incumbent workers during the first six policy years. As workers hired after the policy formed a growing share of employment, the average wage effect became more apparent.

The study also finds that the initial increase in unemployment reflected both higher job-separation rates and lower job-finding rates. The authors interpret the temporary rise in job separations as firms eliminating positions made unprofitable by higher operating costs. This channel then receded. By contrast, the reduction in job-finding remained, accounting for the persistent component of unemployment. The additional unemployment was mainly short term, and the authors report that many affected workers found employment within six months.

The costs were unevenly distributed. The estimated reductions in hiring wages were concentrated among low- and medium-educated workers, whose unemployment rates also increased more than those of highly educated workers. Within manufacturing, wage effects were more pronounced in energy-intensive industries, providing evidence consistent with the role of higher energy costs.

Policy Insights

The paper does not advocate for or against carbon taxes. Rather, it highlights the transitional labour-market adjustments that may accompany environmental policy. The findings suggest that policy design should consider targeted support for workers most exposed to adjustment costs, particularly new hires and less-educated workers. Since much of the additional unemployment was short term, the authors argue that measures such as hiring subsidies and tax credits for new hires, financed through carbon-tax revenues, may help mitigate re-employment wage losses without necessarily requiring substantial extensions of unemployment-benefit periods.

Keywords: Carbon taxes, Labour-market adjustments, Wage rigidity, Employment flows, Climate policy, Just transition

Research Paper: Wei, F. and Yip, C.M. (2025) ‘The ins and outs of employment: Labor market adjustments to carbon taxes’, European Economic Review, 179, 105128. 

👉 Read the full article here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105128

 

STRATEGY

碳稅與勞工市場調整:誰承擔轉型成本?

隨著各地政府透過氣候政策減少碳排放,社會對其會否影響就業與工資的關注持續上升。香港理工大學(理大)會計及金融學院(AF)葉志文教授(Prof. Chi Man Yip)聯同山东大学的魏豐博士(Dr. Feng Wei),於學術期刊《歐洲經濟評論》(European Economic Review)發表題為 “The ins and outs of employment: Labor market adjustments to carbon taxes” 的研究,探討加拿大卑詩省(British Columbia, BC)碳稅對工資、失業及勞工流動的影響。

本研究的主要創新,在於區分碳稅對在職僱員和新入職僱員的影響,並把失業變化拆分為工作分離率與求職成功率兩個渠道。研究結果顯示,政策影響主要透過勞工流動逐步反映;在研究期間,作者未發現現有僱員薪酬出現系統性下調。

研究設計與背景

Wei and Yip(2025)以加拿大卑詩省(British Columbia, BC)於2008年7月1日正式實施的碳稅政策(British Columbia carbon tax)作為準自然實驗(quasi-natural experiment)。該稅項廣泛適用於化石燃料消費,並由2008年每噸二氧化碳當量(carbon dioxide equivalent, CO₂e)10加元,逐年上調至2012年的30加元。由於研究期間碳稅只在卑詩省實施,而加拿大其他省份尚未推行同類政策,作者採用差異中的差異法(difference-in-differences, DID),比較政策前後卑詩省與加拿大其他省份的勞工市場變化。

研究使用加拿大勞動力調查(Labour Force Survey, LFS)的公開使用資料。這項每月進行的住戶調查約涵蓋10萬名個人;主要樣本期為2005年7月至2015年6月。資料涵蓋時薪、失業狀況、任職年期、失業持續時間及所屬行業,並讓作者控制人口特徵與共同時間因素。

主要發現

作者估計,與加拿大其他省份相比,碳稅令卑詩省平均時薪下降2.5%,並使失業率上升1.3個百分點。工資與失業的影響呈現不同的時間模式:失業率在政策實施後即時上升,但其影響其後減弱;平均工資的影響則較遲出現,並隨時間逐步擴大。

證據顯示,工資調整主要透過勞工流動發生。新入職僱員的時薪在政策後估計下降4.1%至4.6%,而研究在政策實施後首六年未發現現有僱員工資有系統性下調。隨著政策後入職者在就業人口中的比例逐漸提高,平均工資下降的影響亦變得更明顯。

研究亦發現,失業率初期上升同時源於工作分離率提高和求職成功率下降。作者將工作分離率的短暫上升,解釋為企業因營運成本增加而淘汰部分不再具盈利能力的職位;隨後,這一渠道便會減弱。相比之下,求職成功率下降持續存在,構成失業影響中較持久的部分。新增失業主要屬短期失業,許多受影響的勞工在六個月內重新就業。

政策成本並非平均分布。新入職的低教育及中等教育程度勞工,面對較明顯的時薪下降;其失業率升幅亦高於高教育程度勞工。在製造業樣本中,能源密集型行業的工資影響亦更為顯著,與能源成本上升所帶來的壓力一致。

啟示

本研究並非主張支持或反對碳稅,而是提醒政策制定者應重視環境政策在轉型期間所帶來的勞動市場調整。研究結果顯示,政策設計可考慮為承受較大調整成本的勞工提供更具針對性的支援,尤其是新入職者及較低教育程度勞工。由於新增失業大多屬短期,作者認為可利用碳稅收入提供招聘補貼及新入職者稅務抵免,以減輕重新就業後的工資損失,而未必需要大幅延長失業福利期限。

關鍵詞:碳稅、勞工市場調整、工資僵固性、就業流動、氣候政策、公正轉型

研究論文(只限英文版):Wei, F. and Yip, C.M. (2025) ‘The ins and outs of employment: Labor market adjustments to carbon taxes’, European Economic Review, 179, 105128.
 
👉 閱讀完整文章:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105128

Your browser is not the latest version. If you continue to browse our website, Some pages may not function properly.

You are recommended to upgrade to a newer version or switch to a different browser. A list of the web browsers that we support can be found here