Skip to main content
Start main content

Journal Paper Published

Rearch

Does Pinyin Spelling Matter in Self-Teaching in Chinese as a Foreign Language?

Ke, S. E. (2024). Does Pinyin Spelling Matter in Self-Teaching in Chinese as a Foreign Language? Journal of Chinese Language Teaching, 21(1), 39-70.
 
URL:  https://toaj.stpi.narl.org.tw/index/journal/volume/4b1141f98e737b1f018ea20df1d40f52

 

Abstract

To date, the utility of Pinyin in teaching and learning Chinese as a foreign language (CFL) is still under debate. This study sought to enhance the understanding of Pinyin's role in CFL self-teaching by investigating the association of Pinyin spelling with word meaning inference among non-alphabetic L1 CFL learners. Fifty-four Japanese-speaking university first-year CFL learners completed one test consisting of five paper-and-pencil tasks, including Pinyin spelling, phonetic radical knowledge, semantic radical knowledge, single-character word meaning inferencing, and contextualized multi-character word meaning inferencing. Correlation and regression analyses yielded three major findings: (1) Pinyin spelling was significantly related to single-character word meaning inferencing, over and above phonetic and semantic radical knowledge. (2) Semantic radical knowledge was directly related to contextualized multi-character word inferencing. (3) Pinyin spelling was indirectly related to contextualized multi-character word inferencing via single-character word meaning inferencing. The results suggested that Pinyin spelling does matter in CFL self-teaching, even for non-alphabetic CFL learners.

 

Keywords

Chinese, foreign language, Pinyin spelling, self-teaching, word meaning inferencing

 

 


Your browser is not the latest version. If you continue to browse our website, Some pages may not function properly.

You are recommended to upgrade to a newer version or switch to a different browser. A list of the web browsers that we support can be found here