The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityDepartment of Aeronautical and Aviation Engineering

THE LAST FEW METRES CHANGE THE FLOW.

Ground Effect & Landing Flare

Set a flare event and compare the same approach with and without the ground. Follow height, speed and lift together.

ONE CALCULATION · CONNECTED VIEWSA · AMBER   B · TURQUOISE

Drag to orbit · right-drag to pan · scroll to zoom. Body pitch = path angle + incidence. Height is exaggerated ×10 relative to distance. A is amber; B is turquoise.

Calculated state · choose a component below

A fair ground-effect comparison keeps mass, speed, height and control inputs identical.

Event timeline

Drag a B event · A stays fixed

Preparing calculation…

Whole-run summary · live values appear above

CAUSE → RESPONSE → COMPARISON

Follow the response

B · solid turquoise   A · dashed amber

Time plots share the playback cursor. Design sweeps and phase plots retain their own axes. A stopped run holds its final resolved state.

Compare A and B

Whole-run quantityA · savedB · liveB − AUnit

A snapshot includes parameter values and event times. Export retains both configurations and their calculated traces.

THE PHYSICS BEHIND THE RESPONSE

Read the model

Back to the experiment ↑

Follow each balance, then connect it to the response above. Open Symbols & units for the notation. A dot denotes a time derivative unless a non-dimensional time is stated.

01 / Resolve the flight-path forces

mV˙=T−D−mgsin(γ)mVγ˙=L−mgcos(γ)h˙=Vsin(γ)

The flare changes lift and path curvature; weight still acts vertically. Contact occurs when wheel height reaches zero.

Symbols & units
m
Aircraft mass · kg
V
True airspeed · m/s
γ
Flight-path angle; positive climbing · rad
T,D,L
Thrust, drag and lift · N
h
Wheel height above the runway · m

02 / Scale the ground influence

φ=1−exp(−4.01(hwingb)0.717)hwing=h+2 m

This smooth teaching fit reduces induced drag as the wing approaches the surface. With ground effect switched off, φ is set to 1.

Symbols & units
φ
Ground-effect factor · dimensionless
hwing
Wing height above the runway · m
b
Span · 13 m

03 / Update lift and drag together

CL=a(h)(α+α0)a(h)=2π1+2φeARCD=0.04+φCL2πeAR

The same ground factor changes both the lift slope and the induced-drag term. The profile-drag coefficient remains 0.04.

Symbols & units
α,α0
Incidence; lift offset 2° · rad internally
e,AR
Span efficiency 0.8; aspect ratio b²/S
CL,CD
Lift and drag coefficients · dimensionless

04 / Apply the flare command

α˙=αcmd−ατα

The selected incidence step is followed with a finite response time. This is a prescribed-incidence point-mass model, not a solved pitch-control or landing-gear model.

Symbols & units
αcmd
Initial incidence plus the selected step after the event
τα
Incidence response time · s

Equations describe this bounded teaching model. Assumptions and source references are retained below. Internal calculations use SI units; controls and plots show their own labelled units.

Model limits & sources

Generic point mass; S = 24 m², span 13 m, e = 0.8, sea-level density 1.225 kg/m³. Wing is 2 m above wheel contact height. The smooth ground-effect factor is an illustrative fit to the FAA approximate induced-drag reductions at h/b = 0.1 and 0.25; it is not a CFD solution or a particular wing measurement. Initial path −3°. Incidence follows a first-order command; body pitch dynamics are excluded. Integration stops at touchdown, CL > 1.6, TAS < 25 m/s, |γ| > 20°, or 60 s. No tyre, strut, crosswind or autopilot flare model.

FAA · Ground effect ↗

Numerical checks test the stated equations. They do not establish aircraft certification or experimental accuracy. Schematic flow markers indicate direction; their speed is illustrative. No manufacturer geometry or performance data is reproduced. Version: coupled-labs-v1.1.

Continue the connection