Skip to main content Start main content

Grade Integrity and Grade Consistency

Grade_Integrity1

What is grade integrity and grade consistency?

Grade integrity refers to the extent to which the grades are true representations of students’ academic achievement. It requires that grades are awarded based on the students’ achievement of the learning outcomes alone and nothing else.

Grade consistency refers to the degree of agreement in the meaning of the grades assigned to students’ work across assessments, assessors, and assessment contexts. This means that the standard that a grade represents is always the same (within the University) and that students achieving the same academic standards should get the same grades.

Grade integrity and consistency are fundamental to the robust and fair assessment of student learning and the credibility of academic qualifications.

Grade_Integrity3

What are some ways to enhance grade integrity and consistency?

To ensure equitable and consistent marking of assessments among all markers, the following strategies could be adopted:

  • Designing assessments that are valid and purposeful (see Assessment Methods)
  • Establishing transparent, clear, and objective assessment criteria and standards (please see Rubrics)
  • Promoting alignment in interpretation and application of assessment criteria and standards across markers/assessors through processes like moderation (See Moderation)
  • Developing consistent and collaborative feedback approaches among assessors (see Feedback)
Grade_Integrity4_Appendix A

What is Moderation?

Moderation involves teachers (and sometimes external experts) in checking, reviewing and/or discussing the design, implementation (or practice) and outcomes of assessment, to ensure that assessments are designed appropriately and marked consistently and fairly. It is a quality assurance process as it helps to ensure:

  • validity and reliability of assessment tasks, criteria, and standards
  • consistency, appropriateness, and fairness of assessment judgments

  • Moderation can also be a professional learning activity for teachers as it encourages:
  • reflection and discussion which deepen teachers’ understanding and knowledge of assessment qualities and standards
  • professional development by setting goals to enhance assessment and grading practices, as well as teaching practices to enhance student learning
Click/tap here for types of moderation (Appendix A)
Click/tap here for examples of moderation activities (Appendix B)
Recommended Practices on Assessment Moderation

Contact

enquiries_478x190

Dr Dawn Lo, dawn-fy.lo@polyu.edu.hk,  2766 5575

Leo Chon, leo-wy.chon@polyu.edu.hk, 3400 2372

 

Your browser is not the latest version. If you continue to browse our website, Some pages may not function properly.

You are recommended to upgrade to a newer version or switch to a different browser. A list of the web browsers that we support can be found here