The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityDepartment of Aeronautical and Aviation EngineeringBack to the lab ↗

MODEL RECORD

Wind-tunnel Similarity & Measurement

The governing assumptions, quantities, numerical method and limits of this teaching model.

Verification checks consistency with the declared equations. It does not establish experimental accuracy for an aircraft or facility.

Model similarity-measurement-v1. Authored 23 October 2026 UTC. All illustrations are original; no manufacturer data or aircraft performance claim.

Boundary and variables

Two independent, steady freestream states: a full-scale reference and a generic tunnel. No spatial flow is solved. Full-scale geometry is prescribed through chord L and reference area S; a geometrically similar model has Lm = λLf and Sm = λ²Sf. The sketches are separately magnified. The ruler alone displays their true relative chord. Particles show a uniform external freestream, with one common visual time scale; no boundary layer or local velocity field is implied.

All calculation uses SI. User pressure is static absolute kPa, temperature is static K, altitude is pressure/geopotential altitude in m, and Mach is dimensionless. Motion is left to right. R = 287.05287 J/(kg K); γ = 1.4.

Air properties and matching

Dry tropospheric reference for 0 ≤ h ≤ 11,000 m:

  • T = 288.15 − 0.0065h.
  • p = 101325(T/288.15)^[9.80665/(R·0.0065)].
  • ρ = p/(RT); a = sqrt(γRT); V = Ma.
  • μ = 1.458×10⁻⁶ T^(3/2)/(T+110.4) Pa s.
  • Re = ρVL/μ; q = ρV²/2.

For fixed model scale and tunnel T, matching flight Mach determines V. Matching Re then requires p = Re_f μ RT/(V Lm). The button applies both only if the calculated pressure is within 20–1,500 kPa. Otherwise it leaves the setup unchanged and reports the required pressure. The ±1% UI indicator is a display tolerance, not a wind-tunnel acceptance criterion.

The atmosphere and constant-property air model approximate actual conditions. Tunnel temperature range 180–330 K and pressure range 20–1,500 kPa are teaching bounds, not an actual facility envelope. No humidity, real-gas effects, wall corrections, roughness, transition, aeroelastic or dynamic similarity is established. Re/M matching alone is not sufficient for all experiments.

Synthetic measurement

Drag coefficient CD is a prescribed input; it does not depend on Re or M in this exercise. Fideal = q Sm CD, Freading = Fideal + signed offset, CDreading = Freading/(q Sm). These are synthetic values. The model does not claim a reliable transfer of actual force coefficients between unmatched flows. A negative reading is possible with a large negative offset; it is retained as an instrument-offset example, not negative true drag.

For independent measured inputs F, p, T, V, S, the first-order combined standard uncertainty is the square root of the sum of squared sensitivity-weighted input uncertainties. Input uF is absolute N, uV is the user percentage of V, up = 0.5% p, uT = 0.2% T and uS = 1% S. The speed measurement is independent of the static T measurement for this uncertainty calculation; Mach is a nominal setup parameter. Covariances are assumed zero. The offset is a known imposed bias, not an estimated random contribution. ±1u (k = 1) is not a guaranteed interval or 95% coverage claim. Large relative uncertainty may make first-order propagation unreliable; no nonlinearity correction is applied.

Interaction and verification

A saves all parameters, including the full-scale reference and measurement assumptions. B remains editable. The similarity map can change Mach/pressure directly; its drag axis bounds freeze during a gesture. Sliders and arrow keys provide alternatives. CSV contains both input sets, result tables and scale sweeps. Share links contain bounded numerical inputs only.

node verify.js writes verification.json. Checks include sea-level/11 km reference states, length/area/force scaling, pressure scaling, q = γpM²/2, algebraic simultaneous matching, bias identity, independent finite-difference uncertainty sensitivities and bounded input grids. This is implementation verification, not experimental validation or facility qualification.