Hold the right quantity
Changing aspect ratio at fixed angle also changes lift. Use the CL–CDi plot to compare induced drag at equal lift coefficient.


02 / EXTEND · Aerodynamics
Stretch an elliptical wing at fixed area. Connect span loading, downwash and the drag created by lift.
An elliptical planform and elliptical loading, with e = 1. The planform uses one geometric scale. Arrows above it are a normalised span-loading graph, not force directions in the plan view. Wake ribbons are explanatory, not a calculated vortex field.
Changing aspect ratio at fixed angle also changes lift. Use the CL–CDi plot to compare induced drag at equal lift coefficient.
Induced angle subtracts from geometric incidence. The section sees αeff = α − αi.
Only induced drag is calculated. Profile drag, viscous separation, compressibility and stall are excluded.
CALCULATED FROM THE SAME MODEL
B · solid turquoise A · dashed amber
Dots mark the selected settings; curves sweep one variable
| Quantity | A · saved | B · live | Unit |
|---|
A remains fixed until you save again. Export includes settings, selected outputs and curve data.
Low-speed, small-incidence lifting-line approximation for an untwisted elliptical wing. Section lift slope a₀ = 2π rad⁻¹, zero-lift angle 0°, e = 1, density 1.225 kg/m³. Aspect ratio 6–18; incidence ±6°. Geometry, loads and downwash all use the same span and area.
b = √(AR S); a = a₀/(1 + a₀/(π AR)); CL = aα; αi = CL/(π AR); CDi = CL²/(π AR). L′(y) = 4L/(πb) √[1 − (2y/b)²]. Downwash at the lifting line w ≈ Vαi.
S05 · Incompressible Flow over Wings: PDF pp. 4–12, 27–38. Candidate diagrams: pp. 4, 8, 11–12; not reproduced. Bridges drag-polar work.
Original schematic diagrams. No manufacturer performance, certification or maintenance-authorisation claim. Numerical verification checks the declared model; it is not experimental validation. Model version: course-foundations-v1.